<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fair Use News &#038; Views</title>
	<link>http://blog.cloakx.com</link>
	<description>The digital world through our eyes</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Geeks in SF</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/06/07/geeks-in-sf/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/06/07/geeks-in-sf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/06/07/geeks-in-sf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/img_0643.jpg" title="img_0643.jpg"><img src="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/img_0643.jpg" alt="img_0643.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/06/07/geeks-in-sf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jokr + Suckr = Losr</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/21/jokr-suckr-losr/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/21/jokr-suckr-losr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/21/jokr-suckr-losr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of Web 2.0 companies and the VCs that funded them are finding out that this is the secret formula for Web 2.0.  &#8212;- and they are all surprised!!  Burning up $5-10M with nothing to show for it is not the thing for another round of funding.  I&#8217;m not the only one to think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of Web 2.0 companies and the VCs that funded them are finding out that this is the secret formula for Web 2.0.  &#8212;- and they are all surprised!!  Burning up $5-10M with nothing to show for it is not the thing for another round of funding.  I&#8217;m <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-9928453-36.html">not the only</a> one to think this.  With a little company on this opinion I&#8217;m not just another cranky geek.</p>
<p>But seriously, isn&#8217;t it about time?  Web 1.0 was mostly a bunch of fluffy e-commerce sites and web 2.0 did improve on that.  Web 2.0 is/was a bunch of fluffy fluff.   &#8212; that&#8217;s innovation for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/21/jokr-suckr-losr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Dinosaurs Instead of Yours</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/19/out-dinosaurs-instead-of-yours/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/19/out-dinosaurs-instead-of-yours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/19/out-dinosaurs-instead-of-yours/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Icahn wrote a killer letter to Roy Bostock, Yahoo Chairman.  But wait, look at the slate of directors he proposes to replace the Yahoo board.  OK, he&#8217;s got Mark Cuban; who knows a thing or two about the Net.  But the rest of them?  You could put a brick to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl Icahn wrote a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/16/business/16icahnletter.html?scp=1&amp;sq=icahn&amp;st=nyt">killer letter</a> to Roy Bostock, Yahoo Chairman.  But wait, look at the slate of directors he proposes to replace the Yahoo board.  OK, he&#8217;s got Mark Cuban; who knows a thing or two about the Net.  But the rest of them?  You could put a brick to sleep with those bios.  &#8212;- I&#8217;ll bet they all have a secretary reading their emails and printing them out.  If you really want to scare Bostock and Yang, get some marquee names like Chambers,  Ellison,  Dyson etc.  &#8212; people who&#8217;d recognize the Net if it bit them on the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/19/out-dinosaurs-instead-of-yours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Venture Capital Becomes Irrelevant</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/15/venture-capital-becomes-irrelevant/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/15/venture-capital-becomes-irrelevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/15/venture-capital-becomes-irrelevant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I attended the Churchill Club Tech Trends Dinner last night.
Traditionally this has been a stimulating evening of VCs looking over the horizon at trends.  Last night it was so boring that I left halfway through.
These guys sound like bankers and college professors reporting on activities that they are watching but not involved in.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended the Churchill Club <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3uuewr">Tech Trends</a> Dinner last night.</p>
<p>Traditionally this has been a stimulating evening of VCs looking over the horizon at trends.  Last night it was so boring that I left halfway through.</p>
<p>These guys sound like bankers and college professors reporting on activities that they are watching but not involved in.   I think that the top trend is that VC is irrelevant.  These guys are not doing startups so they really don&#8217;t see what is going on.  Startups are getting the job done without them.</p>
<p>Thus, they seem to be struggling for relevance.  For instance, there was much discussion of new category cellphones.  Let&#8217;s face it this trend came from an outsider to the industry.  &#8212; Apple.  VCs and existing phone companies missed it.  Roger McNamee and Elevation have invested to try and save Palm.   I think Palm is hopeless.  Jon Rubinstein (former head of the iPod division at Apple) cannot revive it.</p>
<p>Their take on data privacy and silos of proprietary data is a shrug.   This is a huge issue for interoperability as well as privacy and their opinion was that &#8220;it will all work out.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with their view on the impact of new phones as computers to the third world, but this all obvious.</p>
<p>Joe Shoendorf made a big deal about a drinking water shortage as a separate trend from Global Warming.  WTF?  Have you noticed that much of the world&#8217;s water comes from snow packs and glaciers that are being melted by Global Warming?</p>
<p>This is pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/05/15/venture-capital-becomes-irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live  &#8212;- From the FCC Net Neutrality Hearing</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/17/live-from-the-fcc-net-neutrality-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/17/live-from-the-fcc-net-neutrality-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/17/live-from-the-fcc-net-neutrality-hearing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s surprisingly uncrowded.  The Raging Grannies are here along with a few other side shows.

Just talked with John Markoff from the NYTimes as well as the SFChronicle reporter and a couple of panelists

Dean of Stanford Law School

It is interesting that the FCC invited Comcast, Verizon, and Pando networks to appear at the  session [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s surprisingly uncrowded.  The Raging Grannies are here along with a few other side shows.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/1.jpg" title="1.jpg"><img src="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/1.jpg" alt="1.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Just talked with John Markoff from the NYTimes as well as the SFChronicle reporter and a couple of panelists</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/3.jpg" title="3.jpg"><img src="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/3.jpg" alt="3.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Dean of Stanford Law School</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/2.jpg" title="2.jpg"><img src="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/2.jpg" alt="2.jpg" height="417" width="644" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/photos/commissioners.jpg">I</a>t is interesting that the FCC invited Comcast, Verizon, and Pando networks to appear at the  session and they all declined.  To me that means that they oppose neutrality in spite of any PR to the contrary.</p>
<p>Larry Lessig is speaking.  Ah now we have content.   You won&#8217;t be surprised to learn that his Power Point is another of his trademarked turbo-text presentations.</p>
<p>Larry&#8217;s message is simple.  Don&#8217;t let the providers change the network unless they can prove it will harm no one.  The FCC has failed in its policy.  They have let Comcast and others change the network to the damage of the consumer.   &#8212; extreme laughter from audience and squirming from the table of FCC technotards!</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/4.jpg" alt="4.jpg" /><br />
As it turns out the ENTIRE FCC commission is here.  Rather than a fuzzy photo from me you can see their website <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/photos/commissioners.jpg">photo</a>.</p>
<p>Jason Devitt CEO, Skydeck</p>
<p>Gave a wonderfully cogent argument for the need for neutrality on wireless networks as well.  The comparison be the openness of your laptop and cellphone are laughable.  He predicts that when laptops have 3G modems built it will become common practice to be harassed on setup to signup with a cell provider for 3G.  Why? Because the commision on a new signup will exceed the profit on the manufacturing of the laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/17/live-from-the-fcc-net-neutrality-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does RSA stand for?</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/08/what-does-rsa-stand-for/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/08/what-does-rsa-stand-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/08/what-does-rsa-stand-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m attending the RSA conference.  They are outdoing themselves this year in the category of stupidity.  Yesterday I found that my $100 Expo pass does NOT include wireless access.  The explanation was that the Moscone Center does not have enough bandwidth to support the 18k attendees.  So how does OracleWorld provide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m attending the RSA conference.  They are outdoing themselves this year in the category of stupidity.  Yesterday I found that my $100 Expo pass does NOT include wireless access.  The explanation was that the Moscone Center does not have enough bandwidth to support the 18k attendees.  So how does OracleWorld provide open WiFi for 40k+ attendees?  I also learned that they had 15+ meetings on the subject and ended up with a per attendee username/password solution for the PEAP access that needs about 10 people to administer.</p>
<p>Then there is the Al Gore Keynote.  They are paying him $100k for the speech.  Did he invent encryption as well as the Internet?</p>
<p>Tuesday Update</p>
<p>Expo badge holders can attend &#8220;All&#8221; keynotes unless they are on Tuesday.   But they can watch the live streaming of them, even if they are half empty.  I suspect this is because of the talk by Homeland Security Secretary Chertoff.  It&#8217;s hard to believe he has anything more to say about cybersecurity than his predecessor Tom Ridge.    Several years ago I heard Ridge give a detailed, but incoherent presentation at a tech symposium on &#8220;interoperability&#8221; of emergency systems.   &#8212; turns out he was talking about firehoses.</p>
<p>I also watched the security copy turn away vendors with badges that said &#8220;vendor&#8221; because they didn&#8217;t have a vendor badgeholder.  Following the rules!</p>
<p>Tune in tomorrow for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/08/what-does-rsa-stand-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Holdem&#8211;at MicroWho?</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/07/california-holdem-at-microwho/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/07/california-holdem-at-microwho/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/07/california-holdem-at-microwho/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is turning up the heat in it&#8217;s quest to become MicroWho?  While their bluster is amusing, the Yahoo response is between comical and pathetic.  Jerry Yang and Roy Bostock insist that Yahoo is worth more than Microsoft has offered because they say it is.  The stock market doesn&#8217;t agree and neither will the shareholders.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is turning up the heat in it&#8217;s quest to become MicroWho?  While their bluster is amusing, the Yahoo response is between comical and pathetic.  Jerry Yang and Roy Bostock insist that Yahoo is worth more than Microsoft has offered because they say it is.  The stock market doesn&#8217;t agree and neither will the shareholders.  This is like having George Bush and Dick Cheney running your company.  &#8212; things are going great everywhere because I say they are.</p>
<p>There must be a country somewhere that would like to have them run it for them.  (Yang and Bostock not Bush and Cheney)</p>
<p>Bluffing never works when everyone knows what&#8217;s in your hand.  Your move Roy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/04/07/california-holdem-at-microwho/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duh!</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/16/duh/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/16/duh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/16/duh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
OK, they have 110v. outlets on Virgin America.  But:
1) Maximum power is 200W.  &#8212;-  most hairdryers are 1500W.
2) Most of the outlet in coach are dead.
3) Who is going to wash her hair in that little sink?
Geez Richard, have you ever flown on the planes?  Try to review the ads before they put them on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/1.jpg" title="1.jpg"><img src="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/1.jpg" alt="1.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>OK, they have 110v. outlets on Virgin America.  But:</p>
<p>1) Maximum power is 200W.  &#8212;-  most hairdryers are 1500W.</p>
<p>2) Most of the outlet in coach are dead.</p>
<p>3) Who is going to wash her hair in that little sink?</p>
<p>Geez Richard, have you ever flown on the planes?  Try to review the ads before they put them on the side of a building in San Francisco, dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/16/duh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Carbon Footprint</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/16/google-carbon-footprint/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/16/google-carbon-footprint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/16/google-carbon-footprint/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Google has arrived on the Embarcadero in San Francisco.
The restaurants love it.  They fill up the Epic Roast House.  Jan Birnbaum, the head chef told me the other day that he was hosting a gathering for 70 Googlers that evening &#8212;- &#8220;I love Monopoly Money&#8221; he said.  We see the black Bauer&#8217;s buses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/img_0329.JPG" title="img_0329.JPG"><img src="http://blog.cloakx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/img_0329.JPG" alt="img_0329.JPG" /></a></p>
<p align="left">Google has arrived on the Embarcadero in San Francisco.</p>
<p align="left">The restaurants love it.  They fill up the Epic Roast House.  Jan Birnbaum, the head chef told me the other day that he was hosting a gathering for 70 Googlers that evening &#8212;- &#8220;I love Monopoly Money&#8221; he said.  We see the black Bauer&#8217;s buses waiting to pick them up (with their engines idling).  &#8212; got to keep the WiFi alive.   Little compact cars labeled &#8220;Google Security&#8221; patrol the block around the Hills Center.    &#8212; keeping Googlers safe from something.  And this is a photo of their office taken at 6 AM on Saturday morning.   Wow, they are hard workers.  &#8212;- everyone is in the office and the lights are blazing.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/16/google-carbon-footprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good vs. Evil?</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/11/good-vs-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/11/good-vs-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Identity &amp; Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/11/good-vs-evil/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in when I was active in the stockmarket (shorting technology stocks) a wise old gentleman took me aside and whispered in my ear. &#8220;it&#8217;s all crooked you know.&#8221; Well, Jack Fulham is still alive and I&#8217;ve known for a long time that he was right.  I&#8217;d like to believe the he wasn&#8217;t right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in when I was active in the stockmarket (shorting technology stocks) a wise old gentleman took me aside and whispered in my ear. &#8220;it&#8217;s all crooked you know.&#8221; Well, Jack Fulham is still alive and I&#8217;ve known for a long time that he was right.  I&#8217;d like to believe the he wasn&#8217;t right about the application of this lesson to everything in the world.  With Elliot Spitzer I imagined it there was still a battle waged between good and evil.  &#8212; wrong again.  It&#8217;s a battle between scumbags and evil scumbags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cloakx.com/2008/03/11/good-vs-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
